Vendor-A Logs Blame Vendor-B. Vendor-B Logs Blame Vendor-A.
Six weeks of contract renegotiation. Six weeks of floor leads walking corridor 14 every shift.
Logistics is not a routing problem. It is a political problem at fleet scale — one the warehouse runs on, between vendors who don’t share intent and a clock that does not negotiate. The runtime is what stops the floor lead from being the arbitrator.
Steady state is solved. Edge events are not: a lane closes, a pick face empties, a cross-dock window shortens, a priority shipment lands ninety minutes before cut-off. Local optimisation accumulates into global congestion.
Multi-platform fleets share a corridor only if their plans are negotiable. The runtime gives every unit a fleet-aware planning surface — and a coordinator that resolves conflicts before they become deadlocks.
Six weeks of contract renegotiation. Six weeks of floor leads walking corridor 14 every shift.
Re-rank, hand off, reserve dock-door — before the floor lead walks the aisle. After is too late.
Picker re-shelved at bay 17 last shift. The robot picks nothing, times out, and the order misses its wave.
Truck reversed in early. Three units are pre-staged for a dock that’s blocked. Nobody told the fleet.
“We added the second vendor to ease congestion. We got more deadlocks. Now the floor leads spend the shift refereeing.”Operations director3PL · UK
“We’re hitting cut-off on labour, not on the fleet. The platform doesn’t know which orders matter to the truck schedule.”Dispatch leadDistribution · NL
A high-priority order enters the queue ninety minutes before cut-off. Half its SKUs are at the far aisle. Two of the closest units are mid-pick on lower-priority work.
Continuous picture of every unit, its task, its load, its intent — across the floor.
Live arbitration of conflicting priorities — orders, exceptions, hand-offs, deadlines.
Resolve corridor and intersection congestion before it queues, not after.
Bidirectional reasoning with the WMS — fleet feedback influences the order plan.