Plan vs Site · 14% Delta.
Persistent site memory updates against perception; next mission inherits the truth.
Construction sites are the opposite of controlled environments. Weather, sequence drift, sub-contractor activity, materials that aren’t where they were supposed to be. The runtime is what lets a platform inherit the site’s state across visits, so the next crew doesn’t start from scratch.
BIM drawings describe the intended building. Reality describes the constructed one. Between them is a moving gap — weather, sequence drift, sub-contractor activity, materials that aren’t where they were supposed to be.
Persistent site memory updates against perception; next mission inherits the truth.
Anomaly capture, triage with confidence, escalate when finding exceeds policy.
Mission re-plan: defer outdoor coverage, prioritise interior. Crew informed before they roll.
Runtime re-plans around the new obstacle; site memory updated for the next visit. Without it, the crew shows up and stands around.
“We mobilised the crew, the platform couldn’t scan because of a tarp, and we ate the day. The PM doesn’t want to hear ‘weather’ twice.”Site engineerGC · UK
“If the platform can’t tell me what changed since last visit, I’d rather send a person with a tape measure.”Project managerCivil infra · DE
A wall is two centimetres off-axis. A duct cuts through the planned path. A pallet of materials sits where the robot expected open floor. The plan no longer fits.
Interpretation of changing environments — site state versus planned state.
Decision-making without predefined scripts — choose, justify, proceed.
Safe handling of unknown situations, with human escalation when warranted.
Real-time problem solving in the field — closing the gap between drawing and reality.
Construction · Outcome
Robots that stay useful when the site refuses to stay still.